Skip to content Skip to footer

Global Minimum Taxation
Pillar Two / MinStG

Germany’s Minimum Tax Act (MinStG) has been in force since 1 January 2024. For corporate groups with annual revenue above EUR 750 million, this creates new filing obligations, standalone GloBE income calculations and ongoing deadlines vis-à-vis the Federal Central Tax Office (BZSt). The first GIR filing for financial year 2024 is due on 30 June 2026.

MinStGSince 1 Jan 2024
EUR 750mThreshold
30.06.2026GIR Deadline FY 2024
Pillar TwoOECD GloBE Rules
Martin Blesgen — Tax Adviser, Managing Director KWS International, Bonn
Martin Blesgen Tax Adviser · Managing Director → Full Profile
Specialisation Exclusively international tax law and transfer pricing
Qualification LL.M. International Tax Law, Vienna University of Economics and Business (WU)
Publication Editor “Transfer Pricing in Germany”, Otto Schmidt Publishers, Cologne
GIR Deadline First GIR filing for FY 2024 by 30 June 2026 — DAC9 / MinStBV

What is the Global Minimum Tax?

The global minimum tax — known internationally as Pillar Two or GloBE (Global Anti-Base Erosion) — is the most far-reaching reform of international corporate taxation in decades. Its objective: corporate groups with consolidated annual revenue of at least EUR 750 million should pay an effective tax rate of at least 15 % in every jurisdiction — measured against the specifically defined GloBE Income, not the conventional tax result.

The Core Concept

15 % Minimum Tax Rate

Where the effective tax rate of a constituent entity in a jurisdiction falls below 15 %, the parent entity may be required to pay a top-up tax — regardless of whether that jurisdiction has itself implemented Pillar Two.

German Law

Minimum Tax Act (MinStG)

Germany has transposed the OECD GloBE Model Rules into national law through the MinStG. It applies in principle to financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2024. The Minimum Tax Amendment Act (MinStAnpG, BGBl. 2025 I Nr. 353) updated the rules with effect from 23 December 2025.

OECD Framework

G20/OECD Two-Pillar Solution

Over 140 states have committed within the Inclusive Framework. The GloBE Model Rules, the Commentary and the Administrative Guidance form the international reference framework. Authoritative: OECD Consolidated Commentary 2025 (May 2025).

Key Distinction

Not: a Standard Tax Return

Pillar Two compliance requires a standalone GloBE income calculation per jurisdiction and the preparation of a GloBE Information Return (GIR) using the OECD template — it is not an appendix to the Corporate Income Tax (CIT) return.

Are we in scope?

Scope Test — two thresholds must both be met

Threshold 1 — Revenue

EUR 750 million annual revenue

The benchmark is the consolidated revenue as reported in the consolidated financial statements of the Ultimate Parent Entity (UPE) under the applicable accounting standard — not the sum of standalone financial statements (§ 1(1) MinStG). Pure holding structures without operating business may also fall within scope.

Threshold 2 — Time Period

2 of the 4 Preceding Years

The threshold must have been met in at least two of the four financial years preceding the relevant year. For initial entry into scope: check whether 2022/2023 was already exceeded.

Note: Groups below EUR 750 million may nonetheless be indirectly affected — for example as a subsidiary of a larger group or where individual jurisdictions have introduced a domestic QDMTT. Joint and several liability: Domestic constituent entities are jointly and severally liable under § 3(5) MinStG for the Filing Entity’s minimum tax obligation. A German subsidiary can therefore be held directly liable for the group’s entire Pillar Two debt.

The Framework: Three Collection Mechanisms

Pillar Two operates through three interlocking mechanisms. Their order of priority is set by law: QDMTT takes precedence, and IIR has priority over UTPR. The effective tax rate is calculated per jurisdiction, not per constituent entity. The authoritative interpretive framework is the OECD Consolidated Commentary 2025 (May 2025), which consolidates all Administrative Guidance through March 2025.

Primary Mechanism

Income Inclusion Rule

Income Inclusion Rule (IIR)

The parent entity levies a top-up tax on the under-taxed profits of its subsidiary. Governed in Germany by §§ 8 et seq. MinStG. Applies to the direct Filing Entity resident in an IIR state.

Backstop Mechanism

Undertaxed Profits Rule

Undertaxed Profits Rule (UTPR)

Applies where the Filing Entity does not levy an IIR or is itself under-taxed. Governed in Germany by §§ 13 et seq. MinStG — but only from 1 January 2025 (not 2024). For financial year 2024, Germany therefore had no operative UTPR mechanism against US groups.

Domestic Primary Solution

Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-up Tax

Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-up Tax (QDMTT)

Instead of serving a foreign IIR, the state of residence itself levies a domestic top-up tax. Takes precedence over IIR and UTPR. Governed in Germany by §§ 78 et seq. MinStG.

ETR = Covered Taxes ÷ GloBE Income — both components require standalone calculations

The effective tax rate (ETR) is the quotient of two adjusted figures: Covered Taxes in the numerator and GloBE Income in the denominator. Both deviate substantially from commercial accounting starting values and require independent calculations.

GloBE Income: The starting point is the financial statements under the applicable accounting standard. Substance-based exclusions for payroll costs and tangible assets (SBIE) then apply, along with specific deferred tax adjustments and numerous special rules for transition years.

Covered Taxes: Not every tax shown in the financial statements qualifies as a Covered Tax in the GloBE sense. Adjustments for deferred tax assets, withholding tax caps and hybrid-related shifts can cause the numerator to diverge substantially from the commercial tax position.

Without calculating both components, no reliable ETR conclusion can be drawn.

Relationship to Transfer Pricing: Where profits are shifted to low-tax jurisdictions through intra-group transactions and the GloBE ETR there falls below 15 %, IIR or UTPR applies as a backstop. Purely tax-motivated profit shifting largely loses its appeal — existing TP structures should be reviewed for Pillar Two compatibility.

Recent Developments 2025–2026

The Pillar Two framework is not static. Since the MinStG entered into force, significant changes have occurred at both national and international level that materially affect compliance burden and tax impact.

14 Apr 2025

DAC9 — GIR Information Exchange in the EU

EU Council Directive DAC9 (Council Directive (EU) 2025/872) governs the cross-border exchange of GloBE Information Return data between EU Member States. The first reporting obligation is equally due on 30 June 2026.

23 Dec 2025

Minimum Tax Amendment Act (MinStAnpG) New

The MinStAnpG (BGBl. 2025 I Nr. 353) updated the MinStG. For the royalty barrier of § 4j EStG, a two-stage approach applies: from 1 January 2024, the low-tax threshold was reduced to 15 %; from tax year 2025, § 4j EStG is repealed in full, as IIR, UTPR and QDMTT take over its protective function. Further amendments address deferred taxes and the transposition of OECD Administrative Guidance into national law.

29 Dec 2025

Minimum Tax Return Regulation (MinStBV) New

The MinStBV (BGBl. 2025 I Nr. 373) designates the OECD GIR template as the binding format for the German minimum tax return. First submission to BZSt: 30 June 2026 for financial year 2024.

5 Jan 2026

OECD Side-by-Side Package: US Special Status

The OECD Side-by-Side Package grants corporate groups with a US parent entity (UPE) a special status from financial year 2026: IIR and UTPR in Germany are disapplied for these groups, provided the USA is listed in the OECD Central Record as a Qualified SbS Regime. To date, only the USA appears in that register (as of May 2026). The GIR obligation for 2024 and 2025 remains fully in place.

12 Jan 2026

European Commission Confirms SbS Applicability

The European Commission confirmed, via Communication C/2026/253, the applicability of the OECD Side-by-Side Package through Art. 32 of the EU Minimum Taxation Directive — without any amendment to the Directive. This provides legal certainty for the non-collection of IIR and UTPR against US groups from 2026.

Important note — US special rules and GIR deadlines: The US special rules relieve US-UPE groups from 2026 onwards — but do not affect the GIR obligations for 2024 and 2025. Missing these deadlines risks late-filing surcharges and estimation powers of the BZSt.

Compliance Deadlines at a Glance

The MinStG creates new, standalone filing obligations that differ from the corporate income tax return deadlines. The key dates vis-à-vis the Federal Central Tax Office (BZSt):

Central Filing Abroad (§ 75(2) MinStG) The domestic GIR filing obligation may fall away where the UPE submits the GIR in another state and an effective automatic exchange of information with Germany is in place (DAC9 or GIR MCAA). Note § 75(4) MinStG: Mere filing abroad does not protect against German late-filing surcharges if the data exchange in practice fails.
✓ Completed (FY 2024) 28 Feb 2025

Filing Notification FY 2024

Notification to the BZSt identifying which domestic group entity submits the GIR for FY 2024. Deadline has passed.

⏰ Urgent — FY 2024 30 Jun 2026

GloBE Information Return (GIR) FY 2024

First submission of the minimum tax return to the BZSt. Format: OECD GIR template per MinStBV. Simultaneously: exchange of information via DAC9 between EU Member States.

Exception § 75(2) MinStG: Where central filing abroad takes place with effective exchange of information, the domestic obligation may fall away.

Deadline approaching
✓ Completed (FY 2025) 28 Feb 2026

Filing Notification FY 2025

Filing Notification for financial year 2025. Deadline has passed. Late-filers: check whether retroactive submission is possible.

→ Planning FY 2025 30 Jun 2027

GloBE Information Return (GIR) FY 2025

Submission of the minimum tax return for FY 2025. Also applies to groups exceeding the threshold for the first time in 2025.

→ From FY 2026 Feb 2027

Filing Notification FY 2026

First opportunity to use the Side-by-Side Safe Harbour for US-UPE groups. Check whether an opt-in declaration is required.

→ Parallel: Tax Return Variable

Minimum Tax Declaration

Submission to the competent Tax Office of the Filing Entity. Deadline follows the general CIT return deadlines (with professional representation: typically by 31 July of the year after next).

No GIR preparation under way for FY 2024? Preparing a complete GloBE Information Return can take several weeks depending on group structure. Electronic submission is made via the BZSt Online Portal (www.bzst.de). Get in touch now to meet the 30 June 2026 deadline.

Schedule a Meeting Now

Safe Harbours & Simplifications

The Pillar Two framework contains several simplification rules that can substantially reduce compliance burden. Their availability depends on specific conditions — blanket application is not possible.

CbCR Safe Harbour
Transitional Safe Harbour

Where a qualified Country-by-Country Report (CbCR) is available, simplified tests can be used to avoid the full GloBE income calculation for individual jurisdictions: the De Minimis Test, the Simplified ETR Test and the Substance-Based Test.

Period of application: Financial years beginning on or before 31 December 2026 (OECD Administrative Guidance, Art. 5.1 GloBE). Covers financial years 2024, 2025 and 2026 in the standard case. Prerequisite: qualified CbCR with sufficient data quality.

Side-by-Side Safe Harbour

Corporate groups with a UPE in a state listed in the OECD Central Record are exempt from IIR and UTPR in Germany from financial year 2026. To date, only the USA is listed (as of May 2026).

Conditions: UPE in the USA; USA continuously listed in the OECD Central Record; no change to the EU transposition. The GIR obligation for 2024 and 2025 remains unaffected.

Substance-Based Income Exclusion (SBIE)

The Substance-Based Income Exclusion (SBIE) allows a standard deduction from GloBE net income based on payroll costs and the carrying amount of tangible assets. Applies to all affected jurisdictions in which genuine economic substance exists.

The direction of effect is critical: SBIE reduces the denominator of the ETR formula (GloBE net income). A smaller denominator produces a higher ETR — the gap to the 15 % threshold narrows accordingly. Applicable: OECD Model Rule Art. 9.2. Transition rates: 5.8 % (payroll) / 5.4 % (tangible assets) through 2032; target rate of 5.0 % each from 2033.

Simplified Materiality Test

Constituent entities may forgo the full GloBE calculation where the three-year average for a jurisdiction falls below both of the following thresholds: less than EUR 10 million in GloBE revenue and less than EUR 1 million in GloBE profit or loss (§ 87 No. 2 MinStG / Art. 5.1.1 GloBE).

The averaging approach is decisive: falling below the thresholds in a single year is insufficient. Conversely, a one-off revenue spike does not immediately exclude the safe harbour, provided the three-year average stays within the thresholds. Both criteria must be cumulatively satisfied.

Deferred Taxes in the Transition Year

The Transition Year provisions under §§ 70 et seq. MinStG allow existing deferred tax assets and liabilities to be brought into the GloBE calculation. This is complex, but can contribute substantially to reducing the effective GloBE ETR.

The transition year shifts accordingly by the period over which the CbCR Safe Harbour is used. Alignment with the IFRS financial statements is required.

QDMTT Safe Harbour Art. 5.2 GloBE / permanent provision

Where a jurisdiction levies a qualified QDMTT, not only does the IIR top-up obligation fall away — the jurisdiction also qualifies for safe harbour treatment in the ETR calculation. For foreign parent entities with German subsidiaries: Germany’s QDMTT (from 2024) can eliminate the IIR obligation in the parent entity’s jurisdiction for Germany.

Over 35 jurisdictions have introduced a QDMTT (as of May 2026). Prerequisite: OECD recognition as a qualified QDMTT in the Peer Review. Regular monitoring of the OECD Peer Review status is required.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Our Clients Want to Know

Direct answers to the most frequently asked questions on global minimum taxation — from a management perspective.

Under § 1(1) MinStG, direct applicability is limited to groups with at least EUR 750 million in consolidated annual revenue. Below this threshold, the MinStG does not apply directly.

Indirect in-scope status may nonetheless exist: if your company is a subsidiary within a larger group that exceeds the threshold, it is part of the GloBE calculation — even if you yourself are substantially smaller. The GloBE rules operate at group level, not at the level of individual entities.

Groups approaching the threshold (EUR 600–750 million) should also assess whether growth or acquisitions will bring them within scope in the near future — and build GIR capability early.

That depends on the group structure. Three relevant constellations exist:

US parent entity (US UPE): From financial year 2026, you may use the Side-by-Side Safe Harbour — IIR and UTPR in Germany then fall away for your group. The GIR obligation for 2024 and 2025 remains fully in place.

German or other non-US parent entity: No change. The full Pillar Two framework continues to apply, including IIR and UTPR.

German subsidiary of a US group: The GIR obligation continues to apply for 2024/2025. Whether the group uses the SbS Safe Harbour for 2026 is a decision for the US parent entity.

Important: The US withdrawal does not relieve groups of existing GIR deadlines. Missing the 30 June 2026 deadline risks late-filing surcharges and estimation powers of the BZSt.

The first GIR filing for financial year 2024 is due at the Federal Central Tax Office (BZSt) by 30 June 2026. The format is prescribed by the MinStBV (BGBl. 2025 I Nr. 373) as the OECD GIR template.

For financial year 2025, the deadline is 30 June 2027. The Filing Notification must also be observed: it runs until the last day of February of the following year.

Exception: Central filing abroad (§ 75(2) MinStG). The domestic GIR obligation may fall away where the parent entity submits the GIR in another state and an effective automatic exchange of information exists between that state and Germany (DAC9 or GIR MCAA). Important restriction under § 75(4) MinStG: Mere filing abroad does not protect against German late-filing surcharges if the data exchange in practice fails.

Practical experience: Preparing a complete GIR can take several weeks depending on the data available and the number of jurisdictions. Whether central filing abroad actually displaces the domestic obligation in a specific case depends on the existence of an effective exchange agreement. KWS reviews both.

The CbCR Safe Harbour allows the full GloBE income calculation for a jurisdiction to be foregone where three simplified tests based on the Country-by-Country Report are passed: a De Minimis Test, a Simplified ETR Test and a Substance-Based Test.

For the De Minimis Test, the averaging approach is decisive: the thresholds of less than EUR 10 million in revenue and less than EUR 1 million in profit or loss refer to the average of the current and the two preceding financial years (Art. 5.1.1 GloBE).

It applies under OECD Administrative Guidance to financial years beginning on or before 31 December 2026 — i.e. standardly 2024, 2025 and 2026. A prerequisite is a qualified CbCR whose data quality actually permits the tests to be applied.

Using the CbCR Safe Harbour substantially reduces the effort of preparing the GIR, but does not eliminate it entirely. Even where the safe harbour is extensively used, the GIR must still be filed.

Pillar Two complements the transfer pricing rules but does not replace them. A transfer price compliant with the Arm’s Length Principle can nonetheless result in a subsidiary in a low-tax jurisdiction falling below the 15 % threshold — obliging the parent entity to pay an IIR top-up tax.

In practical terms, this means: existing IP structures in low-tax jurisdictions, commodity trading companies with limited substance and cash-pool entities in tax-optimisation jurisdictions substantially lose their appeal under Pillar Two.

KWS reviews your existing transfer pricing structure for Pillar Two compatibility. Particularly relevant: IP boxes in Ireland, the Netherlands, Singapore and comparable jurisdictions.

Through the Filing Notification, the domestic Filing Entity (or a designated domestic group entity) informs the BZSt of which entity in Germany is responsible for submitting the GIR.

The notification must be submitted anew for each financial year. Deadline: no later than the last day of February of the year following the financial year. For FY 2024 the deadline was 28 February 2025; for FY 2025 it was 28 February 2026.

Legal consequence of a missed deadline: If the Filing Notification is not submitted on time, a statutory designation mechanism applies under § 3(3) s. 4 MinStG. The most economically significant domestic business entity automatically becomes the Filing Entity. That entity then bears the full GIR obligation, regardless of whether it has access to the necessary group data. Combined with the joint and several liability of all domestic entities (§ 3(5) MinStG), the liability consequences for the affected company can be substantial.

Missed Filing Notifications can be rectified retroactively. The BZSt has so far reacted with leniency — this typically changes as the process matures. If the notification for FY 2024 or 2025 has not yet been submitted, we recommend immediate rectification.

Have further questions about your group’s structure? We assess your situation and tell you in advance whether and how we can specifically help you.

Request Initial Consultation

What KWS Handles for You

Pillar Two compliance is not a one-off project. KWS accompanies your corporate group from the initial scoping analysis through ongoing declaration to representation before tax authorities.

Scoping Analysis & Initial Assessment

Threshold test under § 1 MinStG, jurisdiction mapping, identification of affected constituent entities and initial assessment of the top-up tax exposure per low-tax jurisdiction. The foundation for all subsequent steps.

GloBE Income Calculation & ETR Analysis

Jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction calculation of GloBE Income and effective tax rate. Application of SBIE, deferred taxes and specific GloBE adjustments. Identification of jurisdictions with an ETR below 15 %.

Safe Harbour Analysis

Assessment of the availability of the CbCR Safe Harbour, SBIE, the Simplified Materiality Test and — from FY 2026 — the Side-by-Side Safe Harbour for US-UPE groups. Documentation of the elected simplifications.

Declaration: GIR, Filing Notification, Tax Return

Preparation of the GloBE Information Return using the OECD template (MinStBV), the Filing Notification to the BZSt and the Minimum Tax Declaration to the Tax Office. Full compliance with all statutory deadlines.

Deferred Taxes & Balance Sheet Matters

GloBE-compliant treatment of deferred taxes under IFRS and HGB in the Transition Year. Coordination with the auditor, documentation under §§ 70 et seq. MinStG. Particular expertise in German-Japanese and German-British group structures.

Tax Audit, Liability & International Coordination

Representation before the BZSt and Tax Offices in the context of tax audits. Under § 3(5) MinStG, domestic constituent entities are jointly and severally liable for the Filing Entity’s minimum tax obligation. KWS coordinates with partner firms in Japan, UK, USA and other jurisdictions.

KWS advises exclusively in international tax law. Pillar Two is not a peripheral topic — it is a core advisory field of our firm.

Also: Transfer Pricing

Your Point of Contact for Pillar Two / MinStG

Advisory by Recognised Expertise

Martin Blesgen — Tax Adviser, Managing Director KWS International, Bonn

Global Minimum Taxation · Pillar Two / MinStG · Transfer Pricing

Martin Blesgen

Dipl.-Volkswirt · LL.M. (International Tax Law, WU Vienna) · Tax Adviser Managing Director, KWS International Steuerberatungsgesellschaft mbH

Global Minimum Taxation Pillar Two / MinStG GloBE Compliance & GIR Safe Harbour Analysis Transfer Pricing Japan, UK, USA
Publications
  • Editor: “Transfer Pricing in Germany”, Otto Schmidt Publishers, Cologne
  • Author: German VAT Chapter, EU VAT Compass, IBFD Amsterdam
  • Contribution to European Taxation, IBFD Amsterdam
  • “Permanent Establishments of Insurance Companies”, in: “Permanent Establishments in International Tax Law”, Linde Publisher, Vienna

→ Meet the Full KWS Team

Initial Consultation — Pillar Two / MinStG

Tax Advisers for Global Minimum Taxation — Request a Consultation Now

Whether scoping analysis, GIR preparation to meet the 30 June 2026 deadline, or support with Safe Harbour analysis — as a specialist firm, we are your point of contact for Pillar Two in Germany, Japan, UK and the USA.

This page provides a general overview of global minimum taxation under Germany’s Minimum Tax Act (MinStG) and the OECD GloBE Model Rules and does not constitute individual tax advice. The authoritative international interpretive framework is the OECD Consolidated Commentary 2025 (May 2025). The legal position in the area of Pillar Two continues to evolve: in particular, the adoption status of the Side-by-Side Safe Harbour (SbS), a possible extension of the Transitional CbCR Safe Harbour and national implementation in individual jurisdictions may change at short notice. For advice tailored to your specific mandate, please contact us directly. → Contact